Direct vs indirect procurement: What's the difference?

Direct and indirect procurement are two core categories every business manages, but they operate very differently. Direct procurement refers to the goods and services that become part of the final product, while indirect procurement covers everything needed to run the business but does not go into the product itself.

‍

This article breaks down what direct and indirect procurement are, their key differences, their impact on spend management, and an example. A strong source-to-pay process gives businesses the structure to manage both effectively.

‍

What is direct procurement?

Direct procurement is the process of sourcing goods and materials that are directly used in the production of a company’s products and that are essential for generating revenue. 

‍

A few examples are:

• Raw materials such as steel, plastic or chemicals.
• Components or parts such as microchips or engine components.
• Finished goods for resale such as products bought by a retailer. 

‍

The goal of direct procurement is ultimately to secure the right inputs to keep production running smoothly and profitably. It’s about delivering reliable, high-quality inputs at the best possible cost to protect revenue and margins. 

‍

What is indirect procurement?

Indirect procurement is the process of sourcing goods and services that support a company’s operations but are not directly used in producing its final products. 

‍

A few examples are:

• Software and SaaS tools such as a CRM. 
• Office supplies 
• Facilities and maintenance

‍

The goal of indirect procurement is to control costs and ensure the business runs efficiently by sourcing the right services and teams needed to operate efficiently.

‍

What are the key differences between direct and indirect procurement?

The key difference between direct and indirect procurement is whether or not the good or service procured is in the final product. 

‍

Below is a comparison between the two:

‍

An example of direct and indirect procurement

In a modern tech company, direct procurement might involve sourcing cloud infrastructure or third-party APIs that power the core product; these purchases are tightly managed, predictable, and directly impact revenue since any disruption or quality issue affects the product itself and customer experience. 

‍

In contrast, indirect procurement covers things like SaaS tools (e.g., CRM, HR software), marketing agencies, and office operations, spend here is more fragmented across departments, involves many suppliers, and is often less visible, with the main objective being to control costs, ensure compliance, and keep teams running efficiently rather than directly driving revenue.

‍

What are some common direct procurement challenges?

When sourcing critical inputs for production, companies can encounter a unique set of risks and complexities. Below are a few direct procurement challenges:

‍

• Supply chain disruptions and delays
• Supplier dependency and lack of diversification
• Price volatility of raw materials or components
• Quality control and consistency issues
• Demand forecasting inaccuracies
• Long lead times and limited flexibility
• Contract rigidity limiting adaptability
• Geopolitical or regulatory risks impacting sourcing 

‍

What are some common indirect procurement challenges?

When managing business-wide spend across multiple teams and categories, companies often face a different set of challenges:

‍

• Lack of spend visibility across departments
• Maverick (uncontrolled) spending outside procurement processes
• Supplier fragmentation and duplication
• Difficulty enforcing policies and compliance
• Decentralized purchasing across teams
• Inefficient approval and procurement workflows
• Limited negotiating power due to scattered spend
• Tracking and managing SaaS subscriptions (shadow IT) 

‍

Why indirect procurement is the biggest untapped value driver

Indirect procurement is the biggest untapped value driver because it's where the most spend is happening with the least amount of structure, control, and visibility. Indirect spend is inherently decentralized, which means that so is that added value.

‍

It's often untapped because:

• It's decentralized: purchases happen across departments, geographies, and teams with little coordination
• There are many small transactions that can either accumulate value or risk, and without visibility into them, it's usually the latter
• It's structurally harder to manage: more stakeholders, different procurement literacy requirements, and no single owner accountable for the outcome

‍

The result is a category of spend that grows with the business but rarely gets the governance it needs. As transaction volume increases, so does exposure to rogue spend, duplicate vendors, missed savings, and compliance gaps. 

‍

The companies that close that gap do so by bringing structure to the process before it gets away from them: standardized intake, centralized supplier data, and real-time visibility into committed spend. That's exactly what a source-to-pay platform is designed to do.

‍

How to overcome indirect procurement challenges

Indirect procurement doesn't fail because teams lack effort. It fails because the process wasn't built to scale. Here's how to fix that.

‍

1. Audit your current indirect spend

Audit your company’s indirect spend by collecting spend data from all systems (ERP, finance tools, and SaaS), categorizing it by vendor, department, and category, and then identifying inefficiencies such as duplicate vendors, unused tools, off-contract purchases, and opportunities for consolidation or cost savings.

‍

2. Implement a clear procurement policy

​​Implement a procurement policy to define clear rules for how purchases are requested, approved, and managed, then embed those rules into standardized workflows and procurement tools to ensure consistent adoption across the business. This helps reduce maverick spend, improve compliance, and give finance and procurement teams better visibility and control over company spend.

‍

3. Define KPIs for indirect spend

Define and track procurement KPIs and spend to measure performance, identify inefficiencies, and uncover savings opportunities across the business. By monitoring metrics like spend by category, supplier performance, and compliance rates, companies can make more informed decisions, improve cost control, and ensure procurement is driving measurable value rather than just processing transactions.

‍

4. Invest in spend visibility and reporting

Establish spend visibility and reporting to gain a clear, real-time view of who is buying what, from whom, and at what cost across the organization. This is critical for overcoming indirect procurement challenges because it surfaces hidden spend, reduces duplication, and enables better decision-making, allowing companies to identify consolidation opportunities, enforce compliance, and proactively control costs instead of reacting after the fact.

‍

5. Consolidate your supplier base

Consolidate the supplier base to reduce fragmentation and bring more spend under a smaller number of strategic vendors. This helps companies overcome indirect procurement challenges by increasing negotiating power, eliminating duplicate or low-value suppliers, simplifying vendor management, and improving consistency in pricing, contracts, and service quality.

‍

6. Use procurement software to automate manual work

Implement procurement automation to streamline purchasing workflows, reduce manual work, and enforce controls across the entire process. This helps companies overcome indirect procurement challenges by increasing process adoption, improving data accuracy, ensuring compliance with policies, and providing real-time visibility into spend, ultimately enabling more efficient and controlled procurement at scale.

‍

7. Put cost control and compliance guardrails in place

Establish cost control and compliance guardrails to ensure all purchases align with budgets, policies, and approved suppliers. This helps companies overcome indirect procurement challenges by reducing maverick spend, preventing budget overruns, enforcing consistent purchasing behavior, and maintaining financial discipline across decentralized teams.

‍

How Pivot helped Flix, a global travel-tech leader slash its approval times

Flix, a global travel-tech company operating across 40+ countries, needed to bring order to a procurement process that had become too slow and too opaque for a business moving at its pace. Purchase requests were managed through a ticketing system that required manual replication in their ERP, creating duplicated work, fragmented workflows, and no visibility for the end users. 

Since implementing Pivot, Flix has achieved:

• Cycle times that dropped by 30%
• A 75% decrease in approval times
• End-to-end visibility into requests for end users

‍

Streamline indirect procurement with Pivot

The right indirect procurement solution is the one that will support your teams in buying faster, compliantly, and at the lowest sustainable cost, without increasing friction for end‑users. Without a strong handle on indirect procurement, you risk missing key value drivers hiding in plain sight, ending up with disjointed communication, and struggling with poorly adopted procurement processes.

‍

Pivot’s full-suite source-to-pay procurement software is designed to connect disjointed communication, reduce manual work, and increase procurement process adoption, ultimately driving greater efficiency and cost savings. See why customers like Flix trust Pivot with its procurement.